Guest Post: Shame on Shaun Rein

The following is a guest post by Tom of Seeing Red in China. Of note also is a similar piece on The Peking Duck.

Yesterday Shaun Rein published a piece in Forbes bashing CNN’s lack of journalistic integrity when it helped Christian Bale organize a trip to Linyi. The main point of his article is sound, CNN did clearly cross a line from reporting news to creating news, but in Shaun’s efforts to hawk his new book and attack CNN, he grossly misrepresents what is going on in Linyi, exposing his own shameful lack of journalistic integrity.

Please bear with me as I pick apart the worst paragraphs of the piece:

“My issue here is not with Bale. In general, I believe one should follow the laws of nations that one visits, and that Bale should do so, but I also generally believe in free speech, no matter how misguided.”

It should be noted that it is not against the law to visit the city of Linyi. At no point did uniformed police officers or even the thugs that chased him away claim that what he was doing was against the law. Rein’s implication that it was in someway illegal serves only to obscure the issue.

One of the reasons I wrote my upcoming book, The End of Cheap China, was to dispel myths and distortions in the Western world about China, by covering both the good and bad of its evolution and trying to bring nuance where organizations like CNN bring activism. Far too many news organizations in the West perpetuate outdated or simply wrong views of the Chinese government and its people for the sake of getting eyeballs or, perhaps, to try to help contain the country. It is sad when CNN’s coverage of China becomes more like tabloid fodder than the gold standard it once was.

Here Shaun speculates that CNN might actually be trying to contain China, when it was covering what actually happened when Christian Bale tried to enter the village. Yes, it was 100% wrong for CNN to hire the van at Bale’s request, but CNN didn’t hire the thugs that kept Bale from visiting Chen Guangcheng. Pretending that human rights abuses don’t happen in China is hardly what I would call “nuanced” or balanced. It’s on par with Global Times pretending that the pollution in Beijing is harmless fog, hardly something worthy of Forbes.

I have a chapter in The End of Cheap China on the lessons I’ve learned from China’s sex industry and how it seems contradictory at first glance that brothels exist in the open everywhere, without local police molestation, while the central government cracks down on Internet porn. A closer look shows that China’s sex industry actually is a friction point between the central and local governments, a juncture where interests often diverge.

The central government might try to shut brothels but is stopped by corrupt local officials. President Hu has called local corruption a serious problem and has made rooting it out a major goal of his administration. My book tries to shed light on the interplay and often diverging interests between local and central government officials and why improvements are sometimes much slower than the central government wants.

Through censoring web searches for information on Chen Guangcheng and Linyi, the Central gov’t has clearly displayed that it actually has a similar interest in keeping Chen’s illegal detention a secret within China. While Shaun’s point about the difficulty of controlling prostitution might be true, Chen’s initial detention was the result of him opposing local implementation of a national policy. In this case the central gov’t’s interest in keeping Chen silenced does align with the local gov’t’s interest in saving face.

As a Chinese co-worker told me the other day, when there is one corrupt official, it’s a problem with that official, when there are hundreds of corrupt officials, it’s a problem with the system.

Bale and CNN’s publicity stunt indicts an entire political system without delving deeper into the reality of Chen’s detention and the interplay between the central and local governments.  I have no idea about Chen’s detention, and if he is being wronged or not, but if there are issues with his case, I am not convinced that calling the entire political class “disgusting,” as Bale does, can help.

When I pressed Shaun on his ignorance pertaining to Chen’s detention, he said again that he would not comment on something he had no knowledge of. The documentation of Chen’s abuse has been widely reported for nearly three months. To have “no idea” about it seems like he is feigning ignorance, otherwise he must have only been reading People’s Daily (even Global Times reported on Chen). It’s fine that he isn’t convinced that Bale calling the system disgusting is helpful, but how can he complain that CNN didn’t delve deeper into the reality when he himself has no idea about it?

Far too many in the West indict China’s whole governing class and system when a single local official does something stupid or brutish. Yet they criticized only a lone thuggish police officer in New York for pepper-spraying Occupy Wall Street protesters. They didn’t called [sic] President Obama evil for what that one officer did, or call for an overthrow of all of America. Yet Bale did that in China’s case, and, worse, CNN helped him.

So much is wrong with this paragraph that it hurts. Firstly, what is happening in Linyi absolutely involves the entire political system. Local officials who were initially involved in Chen’s case have been promoted to provincial level offices, and the brief mention in Global Times indicates that the central gov’t is aware of this illegal detention. Yet, the central gov’t has yet to take any action to help Chen.

The imprisonment of Chen does not rely on a “single local official” but involves village leaders, city level leaders, and provincial level leaders along with a squad of hired thugs.

Shaun pretends that this is in some way comparable to thuggish cops pepper spraying protesters. This would be similar if 1) the police in the pepper spray incident involved faced no punishment, ever 2) similar events happened throughout the US several times each day and 3) domestic newspapers were not allowed to report on the incident and information related to it was scrubbed from the internet. However, Shaun did say that he had “no idea about Chen’s detention”, so I guess it isn’t too surprising how wildly inaccurate his comparison is.

The last thing the world needs is increased tension between the world’s two superpowers. CNN should be ashamed for becoming more like a tabloid and inserting itself into the story rather than maintaining journalistic integrity and providing an objective view of its subjects.

I would argue that it is actually not a journalist’s job to be concerned about whether or not the story they are publishing creates tension between China and the US. The role of the journalist however almost certainly demands checking the facts and reporting the whole story when it does appear.

Shaun argued more eloquently at the beginning of the piece, CNN should not have involved itself so closely in the creation of this story, but it would have been a much stronger piece if he had demonstrated any of the integrity he expects from CNN.

0 thoughts on “Guest Post: Shame on Shaun Rein”

  1. For the record, had I come across this article myself, I would have been far, far harsher than Tom was. The fact Forbes was willing to publish something so willfully — and admittedly! — ignorant is shocking, even to someone who recalls that column from last year when Shaun wrote China had basically eliminated poverty (there are over 100 million people living in poverty in China, according to the government).

    I do recommend you read Richard’s post as well, as he approaches the level of rage that this column made me feel.

    Anyway, as Tom has basically pointed out everything above, I’ll just add this: the most basic advice young writers are given — I recall being told this in fourth grade — is to write about what you know. If you don’t know anything about Chen’s case, what on earth would lead you to believe you should write about it at all, let alone in Forbes???


  2. @ Richard: I think they happened around the same time. Tom spotted yours right before I posted this, but he had already written the full piece, so I figured we’d go ahead and post it anyway. Good to get more eyes on this ridiculousness anyway.


  3. This Rein dude certainly seems to know which side his bread is buttered on. And I guess willful/feigned ignorance is not a barrier to getting published in Forbes. Neither is shameless self-promotion. It seems he’s found himself a good gig.


  4. Hear, hear. Excellent posts, both here and Richard’s.

    You certainly wouldn’t want Rein working for your organisation and having access to any sensitive information that might be of interest to Chinese authorities. On the basis of his writing it’s reasonable to question both his ethics and his loyalty, let alone his journalistic integrity.


  5. To be honest, I don’t think the fact that CNN helped Bale organise his trip changes things in the slightest. CNN can and have already tried to visit Chen Guangcheng by themselves – how does having Bale along change the substance of the piece? Yes, having a Hollywood star being attacked by goons certainly does increase the impact of the story, but not the basic content – that goons will attack anyone who tries to see Chen Guangcheng.

    Rein’s piece is reprehensible. It’s inconceivable that Rein knows nothing about CGC – after all, it’s been covered elsewhere in Forbes. Talk of “police” and obeying the law is meaningless when there were no actual police involved, and no laws were broken by Bale or CNN.

    Strip out these things and what are we left with? A bunch of plugs for his book, and a “you go girl” for dictatorship.


  6. How on Earth can anyone, anyone, take Rein seriously anymore (if they ever did). This guy is the biggest charlatan in the business.

    This article is typical of his dreck. I also agree with Stuart. I wouldn’t trust this guy with a single piece of sensitive information if I were a company seeking China market expansion and entry help. I’m sure he has a “Red Machine” on his desk.

    He is an out and out apologist for the government and the elite (whereas great consultants see both sides of an issue and advise accordingly) he is a shameless self-promoter, just about everyone I know who has anything to do with China business regards him as a joke.

    Yet, somehow he has Forbes and CNBC etc. fooled. But not the China business community. What he mistakes for jealousy is actually the large part of the professional community knowing what he really is and disdaining him for it.


  7. Ah, I guess Shaun got tired of defending the piece and decided to go after me instead:

    and the inevitable regret and attempt to flatter me as penance:!/shaunrein/status/150065240506249216

    Stay classy, guy.


  8. To Custer,
    well, that is the standard CCP apologist ploy, you know. When you can’t rebut the message, try to shoot the messenger instead. We’ve seen it many times before, even on this blog here.

    And what’s with the wallpapering of his feed with his book cover? Maybe he’ll guest on some cheesy late-night shopping channel show soon to try to move some more books.


  9. @Custer – Jeez, that guy is a piece of work. Glad to see you’ve ditched GT though – was the Ai Weiwei hit-piece the final straw?

    O/T – As the situation at Wukan seems to been resolved for the moment, tear-gas is being used at Haimen nearby.


  10. Yeah, I saw he was having a dig at you on twitter, Custer. It’s telling, I feel, that Rein only follows three people, which is utterly absurd given the wealth of intelligent, well-informed China watchers and journalists out there.


  11. @ FOARP: No, I was out the door way before Ai Weiwei. The “final straw” was a combination of things but basically from Liu Xiaobo’s Nobel prize it was clear to me that the sort of things I wanted to write were no longer gonna be welcome there. Anything by my that appeared in the GT after that was something I was specifically asked to write by folks there, some of whom are my friends. But I had to stop writing altogether when it later became clear that their editors were willing to completely change my pieces and my arguments in order to make them “clean” enough to publish.


  12. @Custer – I have criticised people for working for GT, as I thought they risked endorsing the ultimate owners and controllers of that paper – the CCP. However, the people who have subsequently come forward to expose practices at GT (such as Richard Burger’s exposing of astro-turfing by GT staff) have surely made up for any possible harm done by working for them in the first place.


  13. Wow, someone who appears to feel personally insulted by this piece criticising Shaun Rein, and apparently drunk to boot, has come here to make a comment. I guess someone must be having a really nice Christmas.


  14. How about a New Year’s resolution by all serious China bloggers to completely ignore Shaun Rein in 2012 — unless they are conducting a write-in campaign to convince Forbes to drop the charlatan? Otherwise an insignificant figure with his head inserted in Hu Jintao’s rectum merely gets undeserved publicity.


  15. This guy’s hilarious. Wish him all the best on the book… seems he’s painted himself into a corner with this promo campaign though. *sigh* It’s just a shame that every expat living in China can see though 90% of his claims.

    China IS developing and we’re all stoked about that, but most of Shaun Rein’s claims are about 30 years away from reality. It’s pretty simple: most people in Shanghai can’t figure out the traffic lights. That’s not cool. People get in car accidents all the time cuz of this. Now do the math: how much would you pay someone like that per hour? Are we done here. Awesome.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s