the law


the lawAs usual, there have been some allegations about my integrity in the wake of my failure to update this post to reflect the arrest of Wang Zhonggui on Wednesday. The reason for my silence was actually more closely related to a last-second freelance assignment that was followed immediately by a particularly brutal cold which I’m still getting over.

Anyway, yes, Wang Zhonggui was arrested on Wednesday (this article says Thursday, but I believe that is incorrect). This is good, I guess, but it was inevitable. Let’s review the timeline, shall we?

  • May 17, 2011 – Wang Zhonggui allegedly rapes Zhou.
  • May 18, 2011 – Zhou reports to the police that she was raped, the police essentially tell her not to press the issue.
  • Late May 2011 – Police allegedly investigate, state there is not enough evidence to charge Wang.
  • Early July 2011 – The case starts to gain attention on Weibo and elsewhere on the net
  • July 12, 2011 – The case is reported in the mainstream Chinese media
  • July 13, 2011 – Wang Zhonggui is arrested.

I am not a big believer in coincidences. Obviously, Wang was arrested because the local government was tired of taking heat and wanted to look like they were doing something about the case now that people (other than the rape victim and her family) were actually paying attention. To me, that just confirms that this case really is as bad as it seemed at first; the police decision to arrest or not arrest Wang obviously had nothing to do with the evidence discovered at the scene.

Given the evidence described in the original article, I am fairly certain that the police have arrested the right man. Time will tell whether or not anything will come of this arrest, but at least police are taking the case seriously. Or rather, taking public anger about the case seriously.

But why wasn’t he arrested after the crime was reported and police conducted their first investigation? They found ample physical evidence of sexual activity, and given that even their own men were present at the scene when she was essentially ordered to get drunk with her boss, it’s hard to imagine how there “wasn’t enough evidence” to at least detain Wang for a few days for questioning. Hell, they detained Ai Weiwei for two months for alleged tax evasion, and that was a week before they even started investigating!

What changed between May 18 and July 13? The evidence was the same. The witnesses were all there from the get-go. The only thing that changed was the cost-benefit analysis for the government. In May, it appeared that locking up Wang would do little to benefit the government or the Party. It would be an embarrassment, and since Zhou was a nobody with no political connections, there was no reason to arrest Wang if the evidence could be presented in such a way as to suggest the possibility of his innocence. And if Zhou really got angry, well, probably they could convince her to settle things privately, and quietly, with cash. That calculation changed when the media attention came, though. In July, it makes more sense for them to arrest Wang. With the nation’s eyes on them, it’s more embarrassing to let him walk than it is to bring him in late and pretend that’s what you were doing all along.

There was plenty of evidence to arrest Wang from the get-go. If they really thought he was innocent, they wouldn’t have arrested him on Wednesday. His belated arrest proves that local governments and the police department can respond to pressure from society and from the media, but what good is that? The media cannot be China’s police, and neither can the masses on Weibo. They may have won a “victory” here, but how many defeats evade their eyes? This sort of thing is not a freak accident, and though Wang eventually was arrested, many others remain free (and Wang may well be freed once the media’s attention has turned elsewhere).

For example: several months ago, we heard from a connection about a women whose child was kidnapped who wanted to speak with the media. Her story was worse than most — she had made a stink about it with the police in her local area, who were very annoyed by her constant demands they find her child, and finally, one of the police officers raped her. She reported this to local police at several levels, but nothing happened. For a brief moment, she was looking for media coverage of her story — this was how we found out about it — but she quickly changed her mind, deciding she’d suffered enough and a media firestorm wasn’t likely to do much more than bring more anger down on her head from the police and local officials.

China watchers will of course also remember the Deng Yujiao incident, another case of someone in a position of power attempting rape. That case gained attention only because Deng managed to kill the rapist; how many Dengs or Zhous are there out there who are raped and don’t go to the police, or take the police’s advice to heart when they’re told to keep their mouths shut? Or even who don’t keep their mouths shut but can’t get attention in the current media environment?

I’m happy for Zhou that her attacker has been arrested, and I hope that he stays in prison for a long time. But it’s not exactly time to celebrate. This case is just yet another piece of evidence that China’s justice system serves not the people but the government and the Party. And even if justice is served from time to time, it’s the right result for the wrong reason.

0 thoughts on “Hooray…Justice?”

  1. Yeah, justice until the Harmonization of Weibo. Like I said.. actually going ahead and blocking local sites because they dare to inform the Chinese public of what is actually going on… That would be incredibly sad. So FB and Twitter are blocked, but with Weibo, they just have to make a phone call, and have any number of subjects wiped from the site. This is why we can’t have nice things in China (Google, FB, Research Facilities, etc) 😉


  2. Nice update.

    Whether the arrest is coincident with the recent internet uproar and negative press is really in the eyes of the beholder. We are, after all, talking about the CCP’s wheels of “justice”, and thems wheels don’t turn quickly, if at all…unless of course your name is Ai or something like that.

    That said, there is still no victory as yet. Sure, he was arrested. But victory only comes after a conviction, plus a commensurate sentence. There is still plenty of opportunity for all of this to get swept under the rug, especially now that the glare of the spotlight will be turned off.

    I completely agree that, while this incident shows what average Chinese netizens/citizens can do on special occasions, it actually highlights their overall impotence the vast majority of the time as a result of the CCP system.


  3. Just because the guy is arrested doesn’t mean that he is convicted. The allegations of the condom use and rape is coming from the woman and there might be other reasons why the case was thrown out in the first place. Let’s see what happens next.


  4. I detest any legal system which has an inbuilt compensation weasel-out clause, rather than straight down the line, immediate criminal prosecution. The compensation process is alway an unevenly weighted power relationship, esp in PRC. I know. Mediation is cheaper and really harmonious. Hogswash. Forget all the intermediate horse trading for $ over slights and injuries of any type.

    And don’t tell me I am off-topic.This will be the next phase in this story


  5. KT,

    Most legal systems out there has some kind of ‘inbuilt compensation.’ You ever heard of Victim-Offender Mediation?


  6. I recommend an adult literacy class. That was a personal opinion, and not a statement about the various judicial systems in operation around the world.

    And as far as the compensation-mediation approach goes, the Bedouin in Jordan have a far fairer system than the one operating in the PRC.


  7. Absolutely, an arrest is miles away from a conviction, let alone appropriate punishment. This is what i was alluding to earlier.

    His arrest alone is no victory at all. And I’m no lawyer, but I would be surprised if any mediation process was conceived as a remedy for rape.

    Is the guy guilty (ie did he do what he is accused to have done)? Well, only he, the woman, and whatever higher power he may or may not pray to will ever know. Will he be found guilty in a court of law? Well, remember we’re talking about a court of law in the PRC, run by the CCP. I wonder if Vegas will take on that line.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s